Author: Sublaid

Procedural Posture

By Sublaid

May 8, 2021 Off

Plaintiff lien holders appealed from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which sustained a demurrer…

Why Are People So Inclined Over Getting Insta Famous? How Would They Do That?

By Sublaid

May 4, 2021 Off

When we meet someone new and like their vibe, we don’t ask them for their number; we ask them for…

Portable Document Format File – Type and Advantages

By Sublaid

April 29, 2021 Off

Exchanging information from corner to corner at numerous platforms can be done using a portable document format. This application is…

Procedural Posture

By Sublaid

April 29, 2021 Off

Plaintiff salmon sushi Corp beneficiary sued defendant insurer for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and…

How Can aSephardic Jew Get aPortuguese Citizenship?

By Sublaid

April 28, 2021 Off

Afterdismissing the SephardicAlliance from Portugal, now, it is again possible for them to acquire the citizenry of Portugal. The question…

One of the owners turned over possession

By Sublaid

April 28, 2021 Off

Plaintiff owners appealed the decision entered in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which awarded $ 300 on…

Top 5 Tips to Choose a Reliable Gaming Platform

By Sublaid

April 24, 2021 Off

Everybody loves to play gambling which is offered in the Casino games at different places and websites. Gambling was earlier…

Procedural Posture

By Sublaid

April 23, 2021 Off

Plaintiff author appealed from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), in favor…

Procedural Posture

By Sublaid

April 23, 2021 Off

Appellant insured sought review of a judgment rendered by appellee Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California) that sustained without…

Procedural Posture

By Sublaid

April 23, 2021 Off

Appellant employee sought review of a decision of the Superior Court of Ventura County (California), which dismissed his action against…

How Can aSephardic Jew Get aPortuguese Citizenship?

Afterdismissing the SephardicAlliance from Portugal, now, it is again possible for them to acquire the citizenry of Portugal. The question here is that who are the Sephardic jews? Sephardic jews get their roots from the ancient cliqueof Portugal and Spain; referred to as theIberian Peninsula. They have developed the culture and practices of the Iberian community. We can say that their lifestyle is an inventiveness from Iberian culture. Not only the culture but the laws and principles of Iberian cliques are also followed religiously by them.Sephardic Judaic have a lot of similarities in their culture and tradition with the Portuguese clique. Not only the culture and tradition but the language of Portugal is also being spoken by them. This article will tell you that how Sephardic judaic can get Portuguese citizenry after their dismissal from the country. Their Expulsion and The Citizenship In the late 15th century happened a tragic incident which led to the dismissal of the SephardicJews from Portugal as well as Spain. The reason for dismissal was related to the acceptance of Catholicism. If anyone from the Sephardic community objected to accepting catholicism he/she was expelled from Portugal. As a result of this forceful law, many Sephardic Jews migrated to another country and started living there. Although they left Portugal, they took the culture and tradition of Portugal along with them. They established their communities in different countries and did not leave their culture and tradition. 2015 brought some changes in the Portuguese law and those Sephardic Jews who were expelled from Portugal can now again acquire the Portuguese Nationality which means the doors of Portugal were once again opened for Sephardic Jews. Leaving the country where you have lived for years is torture for everyone and the Portugal government did that in the late 15th century but now they are correcting the huge mistake they made in past. Know anyone who belongs to the Sephardic community can apply for Portuguese Nationality and can become a citizen of Portugal again. How to Apply for Citizenry Now let’s come to the main point. If you are confused that how you can get the Portugal citizenry, how you can apply for it, and if any specific rules are needed to be followed. Don’t worry as all of your queries will be resolved by the end of this article. To apply for citizenry, you have to do some documentation. Firstly, a piece of evidence is needed to prove that you belong to the Sephardic clique. Now, the question is from where to get the evidence? You will need to get a certificatethat will include all your biodata from your full name, date of birth to your residence and will declare that you have an association with the Sephardic clique or you belong to the Sephardic clique. In case you can’t get that certificate, there will be some kind of proof needed to prove that you are an associate of the Sephardic clique. Any legit thing that will associate you with the Sephardic clique will be enough. For example, if you can speak Ladino; the Portugal language or you follow the rituals and cultures of Portugal then this will be enough to declare your association with the Sephardic clique. Secondly, you will need all the primary documents that are needed in any country for applying for nationality. This was all about howSephardic Clique can get their hands on the Nationality. The most important thing is the certificate for the declaration of your association with the community. If you have that then getting the nationality will become easy for you but in case you fail to prove your association with the Sephardic clique then you will not be eligible for the Nationality. To prove yourself as the associate of the Sephardic clique is the first and most essential step if you want to apply for Portuguese Citizenship
One of the owners turned over possession

Plaintiff owners appealed the decision entered in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which awarded $ 300 on its complaint against defendant club operator, in an action seeking an accounting, and alleging fraud, trespass, and wrongful withholding in a proposed sale of restaurant property. The owners argued that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the finding that the club operator was not an agent of the owner. One of the owners turned over possession of the club to his estranged wife, the club operator. His intent was to give or quitclaim his complete interests to the club operator, although there was no formal agreement to do so. The club operator entered into a written agreement to purchase the other owner’s stock interest, Los Angeles ADA lawyer but she failed to complete the purchase. This caused the corporation’s stock, which the owners pledged as security along with two notes when the business was purchased, to be foreclosed and sold at auction pursuant to a pledge agreement. The club operator remained in possession of the premises, but failed to meet the club’s financial obligations. The business losses were attributed by the trial judge to the club operator’s ignorance and business ineptitude rather than to fraudulent purpose. Since there was substantial evidence to support the trial judge’s finding that the club operator was a prospective purchaser or vendee in possession and the equitable owner of the corporation and its assets and business until the pledgee foreclosed its lien, withholding subsequent to the foreclosure date was a trespass for which the club operator was liable in damages. The court affirmed the judgment. Appellant city sought review of the grant of summary judgment to respondent company from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California) in the city’s action to recover business license taxes from the company. The company produced and sold crude oil and natural gas. The company’s main office was situated in the city’s limits but the company’s manufacturing and production plants were not. The company claimed it was not subject to the city’s business license tax, because Los Angeles, Cal., City Tax Ordinance § 21.166 did not cover the production and sale of goods. On appeal, the court reversed, holding that the catch-all provision of § 21.166 was broad enough to include the company’s activities. The court found that the term “selling” as used in § 21.166 was not limited to just businesses that were predominately in sales, but included businesses like the company, that were engaged in fabricating, servicing, and supplying goods for a price. The court ruled that the fact that the company’s products did not enter the city limits was immaterial because the actual sales of their products took place within the city’s limits. The court held that the city’s tax claim for a certain year was barred by the time limitations under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 343. The court reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the company in the city’s action for the recovery of business license taxes.
Top 5 Tips to Choose a Reliable Gaming Platform

Everybody loves to play gambling which is offered in the Casino games at different places and websites. Gambling was earlier done at local casinos where a person has to move to a particular place for making beats on some specific games activities. As we are saying that there is a good advancement in different technological aspects so similar happened in the case of casinos. The local casino scenario has now been converted into the online method, and the services are not provided online on different websites. A person who loves to play gambling games can get the same features but in a more enhanced manner on the different websites that are available on the internet. As we are aware, the internet provides a wide variety of gambling websites that a customer can access for playing gambling. But besides, the central issue that most people face is choosing a reliable platform like joker123. Do the gambling platforms are very much, but it should also be kept in mind that they all are not trustworthy and certified as some of them could be Shady. So choosing a reliable platform for playing Casino games becomes difficult, and a person has to do a lot of struggle. If you are a new person to casino in the online method, you can use the suggestions described below, which will help you choose a trusted platform. While opting for a platform for playing the games, you can use these suggestions and check if they provide these things that are suggested here. By this, your decision-making will be much enhanced, and you will be able to do that very quickly and effectively. Checking The License of Platform The most important thing that our customers should think of while opting for an online platform is checking the platform’s license. Whenever you are playing any game online then you should always notice that they may provide some issues to you, so you should have proper knowledge of the authenticity that is related to it. When you would check all the legalities of the website you have chosen, you would be able to defect that you could play quickly, and you would not be cheated. Following disturb would help you eliminate most of the Shady platforms, and you would be left with more trusted and certified gambling websites. Demand for Better Customer Care As we all know that Gambling games are now played online, so here all the transaction must have been done online. In such a case, when you are making a deposit and withdrawal online, you might face difficulties because of some of the issues. If you were playing at a local casino, you could quickly get help, but what about if you are playing at an online Casino? There is no natural person who would help you, and a newbie would get stuck in the situation. So hair, when you choose a reliable customer website, you would be provided with genuine customer care support where you can play the Gambling games easily with solving all your issues with ease. The customer service executive is available 24 x 7 to help the customers face any difficulty in making transactions for playing games. They are methods by which a person can contact customer care, and some of them are by calling, chatting or email. User Interface The user interface is such an aspect most people desire while playing gambling. Casino games involve many strategies for playing the game, and if there is a good user interface, you could easily apply them to the games. If the website that you have used for playing the games is reliable, then it is supposed that you will get a better user interface. Having a better user interface means you will be able to make transactions very quickly, and there would not be any lag. According to this, the transactions are made easier as well as when you are playing the games; you would be able to have many enhanced graphics and other features that they are supposed to be offered. Take The Variety of Bonuses in Use Bonus, if provided, are supposed to be the most interactive thing that any of the gambling platforms could provide to their customers; when a person is enabled with a bonus is he is made so happy that he can play gambling very easily as they support them. Search people who are not able to have involved greater involvement of money in gambling can use the bonus amount in increasing the stake value. The majority of times, it is seen that people are having a lot of advantages while they are offered a good number of Bonus by a platform. But it is vital to notice that there are only a few reliable platforms like joker123 that will provide a user with a valid bonus. Check The Variety of Games The same condition applies to the games that are offered to a person. If the platform you have chosen to play the Gambling games is reliable, then it is sure that you will be offered a good number of games. If a person plays a single game for a longer period, then he might get fed up with it and even quit playing games. So in order to main interaction of players and attraction towards the platform, it is necessary to provide them with an adequate amount of games. A person chooses a certified platform he is provided with an enormous number of Gambling games, and they feel very amused while playing them. The Final Verdict The above written are the top 5 tips that are provided by a reliable online gambling platform to the users. As read above, there are many websites available online that serve the features of gambling games, but you can use the points in choosing a better game. You can get the best platform for gambling as they are supposed to be the best one.
Procedural Posture

Plaintiff author appealed from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), in favor of defendants, studio, actor, and script writer, in plaintiff’s action for plagiarism, quasi-contract, breach of an implied-in-fact contract, and breach of a fiduciary or confidential relationship after defendants allegedly used plaintiff’s ideas to create their motion picture. The California business law lawyers were sought as expert witnesses during trial. Overview The court held that the trial court was correct in granting judgment to defendants, studio, actor, and script writer, notwithstanding the jury’s verdict that defendants used plaintiff author’s ideas in their film and that an implied-in-fact contract existed between plaintiff and defendants. The independent effort of defendants, actor and script writer, in developing the challenged script provided defendant studio with a complete defense against the alleged contractual obligation. The defense was established because the inference of access and use was rebutted. Defendants produced evidence that plaintiff’s work was never submitted to defendant studio, nor was there any contact between the screenplay writers and the people alleged to have possessed plaintiff’s treatment, so neither access nor use existed. Because access and use were essential to plaintiff’s recovery, as a matter of law, there was no contractual obligation for the trial court to enforce, and no substantial evidence to support the jury verdict. Outcome The court affirmed the order granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict to defendants, studio, actor, and script writer, because defendants’ script was an independent effort and there was no evidence to support the jury’s findings that defendants used plaintiff author’s ideas. Procedural Posture In action brought by appellant physician against respondent insurer after appellant was removed from respondent’s preferred provider lists, respondent petitioned for review of judgment of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One (California), which reversed trial court’s decision that appellant’s complaint failed to allege claim for violation of the common law right to fair procedure. Overview After removal from respondent insurance company’s preferred provider lists, appellant physician sued respondent. Citing the common law right to fair procedure, appellant alleged he should have been given reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard before his removal. Trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, but appellate court reversed, disagreeing with trial court that appellant’s complaint failed to allege a claim for violation of the common law right to fair procedure. The supreme court affirmed appellate court’s decision, concluding that appellant alleged that among the adverse effects of removal from respondent’s preferred provider lists were rejection by physician groups which were dependent upon credentialing by respondent and devastation of appellant’s practice. Proof of appellant’s allegations could establish that, in terminating a physician’s preferred provider status, respondent wielded power so substantial as to significantly impair an ordinary, competent physician’s ability to practice medicine or a medical specialty in a particular geographic area, thereby affecting an important, substantial economic interest. Outcome Judgment affirmed; “without cause” termination clause in agreement between respondent and appellant for appellant’s inclusion on respondent’s preferred provider lists was unenforceable to the extent it purported to limit an otherwise existing right to fair procedure under the common law.
Procedural Posture

Appellant insured sought review of a judgment rendered by appellee Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California) that sustained without leave to amend real party in interest insurer’s demurrer to appellant’s cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Overview Appellant insured sued real party in interest insurer (insurer) for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and other claims based upon insurer’s failure to provide a defense to appellant. Insurer filed a demurrer to the breach of the implied covenant of good faith claim arguing that, as a matter of law, it could not be liable for breach of the implied covenant of good faith for refusing to defend except if it refused to settle a claim likely to exceed policy limits. Appellee trial court sustained insurer’s demurrer. In the mandamus proceeding, the court sought to determine if California recognized a cause of action by an insured against its insurer for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based on failure to defend. The court set aside the order, concluding that the cause of action would be recognized. Insurer had a number of ways to protect itself when faced with a demand for a defense. If the court decided against the action, economic hardship could come to businesses, insureds could suffer emotional distress, and insureds would have responsibility for providing their own legal defense. The court discharged the writ. The parties were counseled by their respective small business lawyer in California. Outcome The court to set aside the order sustaining without leave to amend real party in interest insurer’s demurrer to the cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court concluded that an insured may sue its insurer for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing based solely upon the insurer’s unjustified refusal to defend. Procedural Posture Appellants, bona fide purchasers for value, and respondent debtor sought review of orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California), which quieted title to real property in favor of respondent and ordered respondent to reimburse appellants for the purchase price plus interest and costs. Overview Respondent debtor brought an action against appellants, bona fide purchasers for value, to set aside a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. The lower court set aside the sale pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 3275 and ordered respondent to reimburse appellants for the price of the sale and pay costs. The court reversed the lower court because the debtor was protected by notice requirements, reinstatement and redemption periods and a right to postpone the sale. However, respondent never requested a postponement of the sale. The court held that there were no grounds for attacking the validity of the sale, as there were no irregularities in the procedure. Because the sale was to bona fide purchasers for value and a trustee’s deed containing the required statutory recitals was delivered, the sale was conclusively presumed to be valid. Respondent was not entitled to equity because his delays, negligence and inattention were the sole cause of the sale to appellants. The case was remanded so that the lower court could issue orders consistent with the court’s opinion. Outcome The judgment of the lower court that quieted title in favor of respondent debtor and required respondent to reimburse and pay costs to appellants, bona fide purchasers for value, was reversed and remanded because appellants, as bona fide purchasers, were vested with title and respondent had no further legal or equitable right, title, or interest in the property.
Procedural Posture

Appellant employee sought review of a decision of the Superior Court of Ventura County (California), which dismissed his action against appellee employee for unjust termination. Overview Appellant employee was discharged by appellee employer, filed a complaint approximately two years after his termination, and sought damages and reinstatement based on wrongful termination. The trial court entered a judgment of dismissal because appellant’s claim was barred by various statutes of limitation, and failure to comply with the filing provisions of the California Tort Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 900 et seq, which required appellant to timely file his claim with appellee before filing the complaint. On appeal, the court affirmed the trial court’s judgment, because appellant’s claim was based on pecuniary damages, and barred by § 900 et seq. Each of appellant’s six causes of action were aimed at recovering monetary damages for acts and omissions allegedly committed by appellee during the course and scope of employment. The court ruled that appellant therefore was required to file a timely claim as a mandatory prerequisite to the filing of his complaint. In addition, the court determined that appellant’s letter that requested reinstatement was insufficient as a matter of law, because the doctrine of equitable tolling did not apply, therefore the claim was not timely. The parties were counseled by a corporate attorney for the civil litigation. Outcome The court affirmed the dismissal of appellant employee’s action for wrongful termination. The court held that the primary purpose of appellant’s claim was pecuniary in nature, therefore his filing of the claim with appellee employer before filing the complaint was not timely, and appellant’s letter that requested reinstatement was insufficient as a matter of law to satisfy the requirements of a claim, because it was also not timely. Procedural Posture Plaintiff seller appealed a summary judgment from the Superior Court of Sacramento County (California), in favor of defendant real estate broker in an action for breach of fiduciary duty. Overview The seller retained the broker as his agent to sell a shopping center. The broker offered to buy the property in her capacity as trustee of her family trust, and the parties executed a purchase agreement. While still acting as the seller’s agent, the broker assigned the contract to a third party buyer, with the seller’s consent. The broker disclosed that the third party buyer was paying her an assignment fee but refused to disclose the amount of the fee or the price the buyer had agreed to pay. The seller brought suit, alleging breach of fiduciary duty. The court reversed the summary judgment for the broker, observing that a real estate licensee, while acting as an agent, could not receive any benefit from a transaction other than that which was known and accepted by the principal. The broker did not cease to be a fiduciary merely because she was also a party to the transaction. Although the third party buyer paid the full purchase price stated in the contract, the broker had a fiduciary duty to obtain the best possible price for the property for the seller. The seller acted reasonably to mitigate his damages by agreeing to sign the papers to close escrow. Outcome The court reversed the summary judgment and remanded.
Kenneth Loeb Considers World’s Best Travel Destinations for Golf Aficionados

Golfer Kenneth Loeb explores a trio of the planet’s top places to visit for fellow devotees of the sport. Millions of people from across the globe regularly enjoy a round of golf. From amateurs to professionals, many are members of a local club, affording them regular opportunities to embrace their love of the sport. Others, however, keen to explore the wider world of golf, regularly plan their vacations around their passion. With this in mind, golfer Kenneth Loeb takes a closer look at several of the top places to visit for fellow enthusiasts. Keen golfer Kenneth Loeb is a seasoned business executive and realty firm chairman. Based in Ottawa, southern Ontario, Loeb currently devotes the majority of his time to commercial real estate holdings both in Canada and the U.S. Away from his work, Ken Loeb is passionate about golf, as well as travel, skiing, and wine. It’s Loeb’s love of golf and travel, in particular, that have seen the realty firm executive chairman explore a number of the world’s top travel destinations for those also interested in combining the two. Among the best-rated places to visit, Kenneth Loeb reports, are Puerto Rico, Australia, and Northern Ireland. “Today, Puerto Rico’s golf scene is stronger than ever,” says Loeb of the popular Caribbean island. “While the number of courses is limited, many boast spectacular views, immediately setting it apart from the competition overseas,” he goes on, “with Puerto Rico as a whole also a great place to visit for an island adventure.” Kenneth Loeb next turns his attention to Australia, and, most notably, the southeastern state of Victoria’s coastal capital of Melbourne. “Australia boasts some fantastic golfing opportunities,” Loeb explains, “with Melbourne, especially, celebrated for some of the best courses, not just in the country, but anywhere in the world, too, according to many fans of the sport.” Finally, Ken Loeb shares a closer look at Northern Ireland. “Famed throughout Europe and across much of the rest of the world for its golf, Northern Ireland is a must-visit destination for aficionados,” suggests Loeb. From its most famous courses to lesser-known spots, Northern Ireland, Ken Loeb says, should be on any jet-setting golf lover’s sporting bucket list. Also worthy of an honorable mention, according to Ken Loeb, are the Texas Gulf Coast in the U.S., the eastern Canadian province of Nova Scotia, and Scotland – the spiritual home, in fact, he points out, of the modern game of golf. Kenneth Loeb began his professional career as a litigation lawyer after successfully acquiring his law license. Later turning his attention to business, Loeb then owned and operated a thriving packaging company for the next three decades. Now serving as a realty firm executive chairman, Ken Loeb lives in Ottawa, Ontario. Outside of his work, and further to his passion for golf, Loeb enjoys reading, wine tasting, and spending time with his close friends and family.
Overview

HOLDINGS: [1]-The district court properly dismissed the putative class action for lack of Article III standing because plaintiff had not plausibly alleged that, as a result of her purchase and consumption of defendant’s popcorn, which contained partially hydrogenated oils, she suffered economic injury. Given that the health risks of consuming the popcorn were established by 2008, the court was not persuaded that the popcorn plaintiff purchased was worth objectively less than what one could reasonably expect; plaintiff’s benefit of the bargain theory fell short; [2]-Plaintiff did not sufficient allege an injury in fact because she had not plausibly alleged that her consumption of the popcorn caused her immediate physical injury or substantially increased her risk of disease. The California litigation lawyer made a motion to protect the party’s interest. Outcome Judgment affirmed.